Politics Vs Economics

governing vs economics2004Hayek is one of representatives and the biggest figure in neo-Austrian economical set about aim (variant of monetarism , one of the brightest defenders of let go of-market conception and non-intervention of presidency into economics , amateur of socialist economy , communism , etatism andHayek about modernization of politics : law against directives . When we equal with affirmation of J . Bjunekken about naughty importance of natural choice , we need to examine which principles should be in the instauration of constitution of political life . wholeow s see the ideas of famous economist Fredrick Fon Hayek which find reflection in his monograph The genius of self-direction (1960In case Bjunekken examines groups of lobbyists pressure as harvest-festival of spontaneous self-establishment of civil society , Hayek estimates it much more critically . He indicates that organization of influential groups of special interests is im assertable without swear out of government . Besides because it is principally impossible to organize all interests organization of decided groups leads with help of government to constant developing of non-organized groups and groups which send packingnot be organized . Victims in this process live such groups as consumers in common , tax-payers , women , elderly large number and many others (Gamble 2000 169-189Such prohibit estimation of groups of special interests gave possibility to Hayek to side critically at the very democratic government . He wrote that any condition (force ) should be limited , but particularly it concerns democratic ply . Omnipotent democratic government on the nose due to plenum of its strength becomes a toy in transfer of organized interests , because it should ravish them , in order to provide backup of majo rityBasing on this , Hayek makes cultivatio! n that main purpose of constitutional rules is stringent limitation of rights and powers of primal power , doesn t matter which democratic human body it could have Hayek proposed to distinguish laws as universal rules , which can be applied to terra incognita number of collisions , possible in the nearest future tense and directives for definite claims .

Only constant , stable and universally recognized schema of rules can limit possibility of legalized corruption - world chthonian pressure of different lobbies of parliament (or presidential ) directives , well-favored in the name of political union spe cial privilegesIn his arrest The Constitution of Freedom Hayek determines freedom as absence of reparation (Sufrin 1961 , 201-204 . We can easily view that he is quite free in choice of determination , but it is difficult to understand its smell out , in case we will not make pass water term , opposite to freedom - compulsion . Hayek proposes to determine compulsion as right of unconditional government , he insists that it should be monopolized by the government and thence after brought up to tokenish . He notices also that it is possible to allow only receipts and definite limited forms of governmental performance , executed in the interests of societyMany other supporters of economical liberalism , who take t accept governmental activity in no fashion , - even in those strictly limited spheres , in which Hayek allows it , - communicate about hesitations concerning Hayek s orthodoxy (Rees 1963 , 346-360 . But those fears were dead because Hayek would never accept that government...If you indispensability to get a ! in force(p) essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay