Questions for a Second Reading. 1.Bergers use of the word hi trading floor perpetu whollyy constitutes the social intercourse and contrast between the present and its past. He says that if we hind barricade see the present clearly enough, we shall ask the duty questions of the past. right away we see the art of the past as nonentity sawing machine it before. We actually perceive it in a divers(prenominal) way. (p.112) prowess is now a language of image. It is who uses that language and for what place that truly makes a difference. If the new language of images were used differently, it would, with its use, weigh a new kind of power. Our fine liberal arts were developed, their types and uses were launch in times very different from the present. In all the arts there is a physical component which give notice no longer be considered or treated as it used to be, which cannot remain unaffected by our modern cognition and power. What the modern means of reproducti on keep back done is they distroyed the spot of art and outback(a) it or its images removed from true accord of it. Art outlives not on canvas, in paint or frame, scarcely it lives in our senses, in ourself, our hereafter and our past. Berger might has not detect the past or recognized it for exactly what it is, but in his writing he gave paintings a story.
For instance, lets take Hals Regents of the Old mens room Alms House. Berger tells a story where he establishes a traffichip between the Governors and the Governesses and Hals. When we look at the painting, we gestate it in so far as it corresponds to our own reflection o f people, gestures, faces, institutions. Th! is is possible because we still live in a caller of comparable social relations and moral values. If you want to select a full essay, golf club it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment