US History CR3 - Creation of the Constitution Essays - Law

US History CR3 - Creation of the Constitution Directions: Your answer must be a minimum of 5 complete sentences. Prompt: The Constitution created a government very different than the government under the Articles of Confederation because the principlesseparation of powers, federalism, and checks and balanceswere applied differently . Therefore, explain how separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances were different under the Constitution than they were unde r the Articles of Confederation. Response: The principles of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances were applied differently in both the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government that was established was only a Congress. The Congress consisted of one body with each statepossessing one vote. Every individual state had to vote in a unanimous agreement for any amend to be passed. The Congress had no taxing power, no power over interstate or foreign commerce. There was no federal courts, no independent executive, and all laws were only enforced by the courts of the states. That being said, only the state governments acted directly on the people, and every state was sovereign. Under the Constitution, The federal government that was established was composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch was headed by Congress. Congress included two distinct parts- the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House possessed the power of creation of laws. The Senate had the power of impeaching officials and approving treaties. The executive branch headed by the President. Included in the executive branch were two distinct parts (after the President) - the Vice President and the Cabinet. The President, the Vice President, the Cabinet had the power to carry out, execute and enforce the law. The judicial branch was headed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had the power to declare the constitutionality of laws, to overturn rulings, and interpretation of laws. Instead of requiring every individual state for a unanimous agreement for any amend to be passed, only 3/4ths of the states needed to be in agreement. Congress gained the power to create and collect taxes, duties,imposts, and excises, to regulate commerce with othernations and among the states. Federal courts were created, an Independent executive was created and chosen by the Electoral College, all laws were enforced by all courts. That being said, both central government and state governments acted directly on the people, and everyone in the nation was sovereign. The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation applied the principles of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances in extremely different manners.

Free Essays on The Bridle

The Bridle Throughout the story Holits’ character builds and as the story progresses you realize his life revolved around manly one thing, his horse. His horse meant a lot to him even though it was the main reason for his deteriorating life. After Holits lost his horse and farm the one thing he kept in his journey to Arizona was his horses bridle. This bridle symbolized Holits’ love for his horse and the farm life. In the beginning of the story Holits carries the bridle into his new home in Arizona. This shows Holits’ attachment to the bridle and the horse because there are no farms or horses around his new home. â€Å"There’s not much to farm around here . . .† (193). Later in the story you realize that Holits put all his effort and money into that horse, which shows how much that horse meant to him because the horse never won a race. â€Å"The fact is, whenever it ran, it lost. . . But Holits is stubborn if he’s anything. He wouldn’t give up† (199). No matter what the odds Holits would bet on his horse. Holits dedicated his life to that horse and sadly nothing came back to him in return. After Holits had lost almost everything including the horse, he was forced to start a new life in Arizona. Even after the horse made him lose everything, he still kept the memory of the horse close by, with keeping the bridle. However, Holits luck had run o ut again and he was injured forcing him and his family to move a second time and live off his wife’s sister. In the end of the story Marge finds the bridle, it had been left behind by Holits. â€Å"Back in the corner of the drawer I see the bridle he was carrying in when he first came† (208). â€Å"Maybe the man left it on purpose† Marge realizes that Holits maybe wants to start a new life free from the horse and all the troubles it has caused him (208). In conclusion the bridle symbolized Holits’ determination and love for his horse, however in the end he finally ... Free Essays on The Bridle Free Essays on The Bridle The Bridle Throughout the story Holits’ character builds and as the story progresses you realize his life revolved around manly one thing, his horse. His horse meant a lot to him even though it was the main reason for his deteriorating life. After Holits lost his horse and farm the one thing he kept in his journey to Arizona was his horses bridle. This bridle symbolized Holits’ love for his horse and the farm life. In the beginning of the story Holits carries the bridle into his new home in Arizona. This shows Holits’ attachment to the bridle and the horse because there are no farms or horses around his new home. â€Å"There’s not much to farm around here . . .† (193). Later in the story you realize that Holits put all his effort and money into that horse, which shows how much that horse meant to him because the horse never won a race. â€Å"The fact is, whenever it ran, it lost. . . But Holits is stubborn if he’s anything. He wouldn’t give up† (199). No matter what the odds Holits would bet on his horse. Holits dedicated his life to that horse and sadly nothing came back to him in return. After Holits had lost almost everything including the horse, he was forced to start a new life in Arizona. Even after the horse made him lose everything, he still kept the memory of the horse close by, with keeping the bridle. However, Holits luck had run o ut again and he was injured forcing him and his family to move a second time and live off his wife’s sister. In the end of the story Marge finds the bridle, it had been left behind by Holits. â€Å"Back in the corner of the drawer I see the bridle he was carrying in when he first came† (208). â€Å"Maybe the man left it on purpose† Marge realizes that Holits maybe wants to start a new life free from the horse and all the troubles it has caused him (208). In conclusion the bridle symbolized Holits’ determination and love for his horse, however in the end he finally ...

The Code of Silence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Code of Silence - Essay Example In the legal setting, the code of silence is believed to be prevalent in the armed forces where data regarding operations and technological developments are kept secret for the sake of national security. It could also be found in the corporate setting especially in banks which can keep the anonymity of clients. The code of silence is usually either kept because of force or danger to oneself, or being branded as a traitor or an outcast within the unit or organization which particularly holds true in a police setting as studies would show. It was famously practiced in Massachusetts police departments in cities such as Charlestown, South Boston and Somerville. All over the world, there are many stories about police abuse of authority or police/military brutality and death of a criminal and most of these stories are linked with the code of silence.The code also exists among many organizations even those which are criminal in nature. A more famous example of the code of silence is Omerta which made the Mafia such an indiscrete and almost impenetrable organization. If we are to determine whether the appropriateness of the code, we will need to include a discussion on what constitutes the goodness or the wickedness of an act. However, venturing into this would be exhaustive and too wide a discussion.

Timeline Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Timeline - Essay Example The American Revolution took place during 1775 and 1783 and was led by George Washington. The purpose of the American Revolution was to gain freedom and equality for every man and woman in the United States. They felt that since everyone was created equally, they should be treated equally as well. George Washington took it upon himself to make sure that the United States became the great country of equality that it is today. July 4, 1776 brought about the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a document that guaranteed the freedom of people living in America. Many important figures took place in this event, including John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Hancock, all of whom were among those to sign the Declaration. It was on this day that the United States gained its independence from other countries and powers that used to be stronger than the United States of America. The previously mentioned men helped to make it possible. Almost a decade later, on September 17, 1787, the Constitution of the United States was introduced to a land that was steadily becoming freer and more equal for all who lived there. The Constitution contains the basic freedoms of Americans, from being able to vote to being treated equally in society regardless of race, gender, nationality, or religion. George Washington and James Madison were among those present for the introduction of the Constitution, and played important roles in the adaptation of the new laws. On January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln announced an end to slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation, an order introduced during the American Civil War. This order proclaimed freedom for more than three million slaves, five hundred thousand of which were immediately freed. The rest of the slaves were freed as the war become worse. Because of the Emancipation Proclamation, it is now illegal to own slaves in the United States, as well as in other countries

Problem Solution & Defense Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Problem Solution & Defense - Essay Example As a part of this process, it has also acquired Enviro Tech, which is one of the Company’s major domestic competitors. Some of the salient issues that need to be addressed are as follows: (a) managing the merger with Enviro Tech successfully, paying attention to organizational issues (b) addressing the concerns of the old time employees of Inter clean and (c) the issue of training for employees. The goal of this process of transition is to transform the Company’s purely sales based approach to a solutions based approach. As a part of this approach, the organizational framework of the Company has changed, with the acquisition of Enviro tech. People management plays a critical role in a successful merger and acquisition as in this case of acquisition of Enviro tech by Inter clean, with sensitive decisions to be made on issues such as organizational design and staffing, etc but these are often elements that are overlooked. (www.coolavernues.com). In the case of Inter Clean after the acquisitions process, the members of the executive team all have different agendas and there is a lack of coordination and integration in terms of goals, motivation and long term interests of the Company. Tom wants to pursue global expansion, Sally is interested in further mergers, Janet wants to retain the status quo in terms of HR policy and Garcia and the others want to take over an important role in Sales and Marketing. This has created a win/lose situation as part of a distributive negotiations process, as a result of which there is confusion in goals, especially among Inter clean employees. There is also a conflict between the employees of Inter Clean and Enviro tech. Janet does not want to let the old employees go, while the executive team wants to include employees of Enviro tech. This is causing difficulties and confusion among employees, since some of them anticipate being

It is Difficult to Forgive

It is Difficult to Forgive Sometimes forgiveness can be difficult. It is not always easy to forgive someone for doing something wrong. There may be times where the transgression is so severe that it causes a person to think differently about someone, never being able to forget what they did to them. The Sunflower is a book about the possibilities and limits of forgiveness. Simon Wiesenthal, a Jewish prisoner, is called to the bedside of a dying Nazi soldier and is faced with the dilemma of being asked for forgiveness for the soldiers horrible atrocities he had committed during the war. The Jewish boy is unsure of what he should do or say. As he sits by the dying man listening to his story and comforting him for his last few minutes on Earth, he cannot bring himself to respond in any way. The boy sits in silence and does not grant nor deny the dying Nazis request for forgiveness. There are many terms for being forgiven. One cannot simply go through life doing whatever they please to anyone and expecting an apology will suffice afterwards. One cannot, and should not, go around happily killing and torturing and then, when the moment has come, simply ask, and receive, forgiveness, says Herbert Mercuse (Mercuse 208). A person may offend someone and feel guilty about it and then seek forgiveness from the person so that they may be on good terms with each other again after. Usually, after a transgression has occurred, the person who has been wronged may be upset or angry. They may not be able to offer forgiveness right away. The perpetrator must respect their need for time and understand that what they have done offended them. The recognition, if nothing else, is an important first step, says Sven Alkalaj (Alkalaj 103). Forgiveness cannot just be requested from anyone. In order for someone to give forgiveness they need to be involved in the actions committed by the individual. If someone greatly offends you and then asks another person for forgiveness and they say yes does that really mean they are forgiven for their actions? Simon was not able to forgive this man on behalf of the victims who were so maliciously murdered. Alan L. Berger says, I may forgive one who has sinned against me. I may not forgive one who has taken the life of another, (Berger 118). Does Simon really think that if he could contact the dead victims that they would want to offer this man forgiveness? Absolutely not. The Holocaust itself was a massive massacre. Literally millions of innocent people were brutally murdered just for not meeting the requirements of the perfect race. Anyone and everyone involved besides the victims do not deserve any forgiveness for such a horrible event. Even Franklin H. Littell says that, The probl em of the dying perpetrator was the fact that the only human persons who could have forgiven him were dead (Littell 197). Families and children were murdered in front of one another for no reason. How can a monster be given forgiveness for these actions even on his death bed? A misconception about forgiveness comes when it is confused with condoning or pardoning the offensive behavior. Forgiveness is not the same thing as forgetting, condoning, or pardoning. In todays modern times it seems that the typical behavior is to forgive and forget. Just because we forgive does not mean that we do not seek justice, speak out against the offender, or seek restitution. These things are all distinct from the act of forgiveness. The dying soldier may have truly been sorry for the things he had done. He may have actually deserved the chance to be forgiven, but even then the things he did would not just disappear. The crimes committed by this dying soldier and all the other soldiers are not simply something that can go away upon forgiveness. The solider seeking forgiveness was lucky to be dying before facing any real consequences of his actions. What these men were doing was extremely illegal and morally wrong. There is no way to replace a little boys murdered parents and siblings. After the Holocaust, trials were held to condemn the men responsible for these atrocities. Most of the men who were convicted were sentenced to death. The law offers no forgiveness. Another common misconception about forgiveness is that it makes the offended seem weak by accepting an apology and simply forgiving. It is never easy to forgive someone who has wronged you in some way. It is especially hard to forgive someone if what they have done has extremely hurt you emotionally and even physically in this case. There are many other people who actually think that the soldier could have deserved forgiveness (Wells). He could have been truly sorry for his actions. Some of the Holocaust survivors choose to forgive the soldiers that did these things because otherwise they would be angry and vengeful. They realize they were put through horrible unnecessary torture, but they need to move on with their lives in order to achieve a healthy life. Just as a victim of any other type of attack needs to often go to therapy sessions to try and overcome that obstacle in their life. It is all about allowing time to heal the wounds since the event. It is normal to be upset for more than a day for some things. Eva Fleischner talks about how the dying Nazi soldier is actually still at fault with his attempt at seeking forgiveness. The dying man simply wants any Jew to come to his bedside to listen to his plea. Yet, the man is oblivious to the ongoing pain and suffering of the Jews even after this mans passing. Viewing Simon as a representative of his people, he seeks to absolve himself and ease his insistent conscience through confessing and expressing his regret to him. He begs for a response, for confirmation that his remorse is accepted. He desperately awaits the comforting words that might provide him a peaceful death. Simon, torn and confused, himself still captive in a living hell manned by this mans comrades, holds his silence. That silence will forever trouble him, tugging at his conscience till his last day. This dying man represents each and every one of the murdering Nazi soldiers. Even after he is dead there will continue to be more deaths of Jews. Fleischner considers the possi bility that if maybe the dying man would have summoned another Nazi guard, that he could have given a more genuine apology (Fleischner 143). Another thing that is sometimes thought about forgiveness that is not true is the idea that refusing to forgive is a fitting way to punish the offender. In the story the dying soldier made a deathbed wish; to confess his crimes to a Jew and to have that person forgive him. Some people believe that forgiving him would have given him exactly what he wanted. And withholding that forgiveness would have punished him, quite justly, for his heinous acts. I do not think that this was Simons intentions at all. He did not have any thought of trying to punish the soldier more than the anguish he was already in. More often than not, it is the one who refuses to forgive who suffers more. In this case that is true. Because of Simons own silence he is devastated of whether or not he made the right choice. The act of forgiving is something that we carry with us throughout our entire lives. The fact that we do not truly forget what has happened once we forgive means that there will always be the thought of that event in the back of our minds. If a sibling hurts you, but then apologizes, each time you see them there will be that memory and you will silently forgive them again for their regretful actions. This happens with everything that you offer forgiveness for. It would not make sense to forgive someone and then when you think of the event you get upset. In that case, that would mean that your forgiveness was not truly meant and you still resented them for doing what they did. Simon is still haunted by this experience years after it occurred. He ponders whether or not he made the right decision. He truly felt that this dying mans apology was sincere, and that he may have been truly resentful for his sins. Still Simon remained silent and offered no reconciliation to this man. He held his hand through the whole story and even swatted away flies that bothered the dying soldier. It was simply not his position to be able to offer forgiveness for this mans sins. Since the victims are dead, God is the only one who can offer him any peace of mind. Simon cannot offer a response that might not be what the victims would want. I am sure the victims would much rather have been alive then cruelly murdered. Forgiveness is not for the weak or timid. It is not the same as condoning a behavior. Withholding forgiveness leads to more suffering for us than the offender, and the practice of forgiveness is not a one-shot deal; it is a life-long discipline.

The Cultural Politics of Pokemon Capitalism :: Entertainment Games Collectors Papers

The Cultural Politics of Pokemon Capitalism It is fall 1999 and a jet from Japan has just pulled up to its berth at LAX airport in Los Angeles. Immediately a crowd of kids excitedly gathers by the window to view what appears to be a huge flying Pikachu: the yellowy cute, electrically charged mouse-type pocket monster of what was then the biggest kid’s craze of the decade, Pokemon. Even parents recognize this iconic figure, familiar as they are with the basics of the phenomenon. Starting out as a gameboy game in Japan in 1996, it grew quickly to a multi-stranded empire: comic books, cartoon, movies, trading cards, toy figures, video games, tie-in merchandise. And, starting in 1997, Pokemon got exported, hitting the U.S. in August 1998. The principle of the game, duplicated in the plotline of the movies, cartoons, and comics, is to become a pokemon master by trying to capture all 151 monsters (expanded to 251 in recent editions) inhabiting the playscapes of Poke-world. In this world, any child can become a master lik e Satoshi (Ash in English) who, in the story versions, is the 11 year old protagonist traveling the world with his two buddies, Misty (an 11 year old girl) and Brock (a 15 year old teenage boy). All one needs to do is keep playing: maneuver one’s controls to move through this game space, discovering and catching (mainly by fighting) new monsters whom consequently become pocketed as one’s own. Hence, the name â€Å"pocket monster.† Pocketed monsters are trained to fight new monsters therefore becoming both the medium and end of this game. The logic here is acquisition; â€Å"gotta catch ‘em all† is the catchword of Pokemon. But entwined into this, as Benjamin noted about commodity fetishism at the dawn of modernity, is enchantment. The monsters to be gotten are not only things, possessions, and tools but also enchanting beings akin to spirits, pets, or friends. Pikachu iconizes this weave of relationality taken, I will argue, to the age of millennial postmodernity. With its electric powers, Pikachu is a tough, therefore prized, pokemon. But, with its smallish, yellow body, Pikachu is also cuddly and cute: features played up on screen whe re it becomes the best buddy pokemon of the lead character, Ash. This monster is at once property and pal, capital and companion: the key features in a form of intimate or cute